How China Threatens American Democracy
作者:Robert C. O’Brien 来源:foreignaffairs.com
For decades, conventional wisdom in the United States held
that it was only a matter of time before China would become more liberal, first
economically and then politically. We could not have been more wrong—a
miscalculation that stands as the greatest failure of U.S. foreign policy since
the 1930s. How did we make such a mistake? Primarily by ignoring the ideology
of the Chinese Communist Party. Instead of listening to the CCP’s leaders and
reading its key documents, we believed what we wanted to believe: that the
Chinese ruling party is communist in name only.
Today, it would be a similarly grave mistake to assume that this ideology
matters only within China. In fact, the CCP’s ideological agenda extends far
beyond the country’s borders and represents a threat to the idea of democracy
itself, including in the United States. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s
ambitions for control are not limited to the people of China. Across the globe,
the CCP aims to spread propaganda, restrict speech, and exploit personal data
to malign ends. The United States, accordingly, cannot simply ignore the CCP’s
ideological objectives. Washington must understand that the fight against
Chinese aggression first requires recognizing it and defending ourselves
against it here at home, before it is too late.
WORDS ARE BULLETS
The CCP is a self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist organization, and Xi, as the
party’s top general, sees himself as Stalin’s successor. Marxism-Leninism is a
totalitarian worldview that maintains that all important aspects of life should
be controlled by the state, and the CCP’s intent to dominate political thought
is stated openly and pursued aggressively. For many years, the CCP’s leaders have
emphasized the importance of “ideological security.” A 2013 Chinese policy on
the “current state of ideology” held that there should be “absolutely no
opportunity or outlets for incorrect thinking or viewpoints to spread.”
“Chinese leaders have always believed that power derives from controlling
both the physical battlefield and the cultural domain,” the journalist and
former Australian government official John Garnaut has noted. “Words are not
vehicles of reason and persuasion. They are bullets. Words are for defining,
isolating, and destroying opponents.” Within China, this approach means
mandatory study sessions on communist ideology and the required use of
smartphone apps teaching “Xi Jinping Thought.” It means heavy censorship of all
media. Outside sources of information are banned—from foreign newspapers to
Twitter, Facebook, and WhatsApp. The CCP reinterprets religious texts,
including the Bible, to support its ideology and locks up millions of Muslim
Uighurs and other minorities in reeducation camps, where they are subjected to
political indoctrination and forced labor.
Efforts to extend this control of information and expression globally are
well underway. Nearly every Chinese-language news outlet in the United States
is owned by the CCP or follows its editorial line. Americans hear pro-Beijing
propaganda on more than a dozen FM radio stations.
Chinese-owned TikTok deletes accounts criticizing CCP policies. Since
August 2019, Twitter has removed more than 170,000 CCP-linked accounts for
spreading “manipulative and coordinated” propaganda. It is no coincidence that
China has expelled so many Western reporters in recent months—Beijing wants the
world to get its news about China, and especially about the origins of the
novel coronavirus, from its own propaganda organs.
The CCP is increasingly using its leverage to control American speech.
In addition to influencing the information Americans receive regarding
China, the CCP is increasingly using its leverage to control American speech.
When the general manager of the Houston Rockets basketball team tweeted his
support for peaceful protesters in Hong Kong, the CCP announced that Rockets
games would not be shown on Chinese TV and pressed others associated with the
league, including star players, to criticize the tweet. Under pressure from the
CCP, American, Delta, and United Airlines removed references to Taiwan from
their websites and in-flight magazines. Mercedes Benz apologized for posting an
inspirational quote from the Dalai Lama. MGM digitally changed the nationality
of an invading military from Chinese to North Korean in a remake of the movie
Red Dawn. In the credits for its 2020 remake of Mulan, Disney thanked public
security and propaganda bureaus in Xinjiang, where the CCP has locked up
millions of minorities in concentration camps.
The CCP is also gathering leverage over individuals by collecting
Americans’ data—their words, purchases, whereabouts, health records, posts,
texts, and social networks. This data is collected through security flaws and
backdoors in hardware, software, telecommunications, and genetics products
(many operated by CCP-subsidized businesses such as Huawei and ZTE) as well as
by theft. Beijing hacked Anthem Health Insurance in 2014; the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, which holds security clearance information on millions of
government employees, in 2015; Equifax in 2017; and Marriot Hotels in 2019. In
these instances alone, the CCP gathered key information on at least half of all
living Americans, including their names, birth dates, Social Security numbers,
credit scores, health records, and passport numbers. The CCP will use this data
the same way it uses data within China’s borders: to target, influence, harass,
and even blackmail Americans to say and do things that serve the CCP’s
interests.
The CCP also uses trade to coerce compliance. For example, when Australia
called for an independent investigation of the coronavirus’s origin and spread,
Beijing imposed an 80 percent tariff on Australian barley exports, threatened
to stop buying Australian agricultural products altogether, and signaled it
would prevent Chinese students and tourists from traveling to Australia. Most
recently, the CCP reportedly ordered importers to stop buying Australian coal.
Reshaping international organizations is another part of China’s plan.
China has sought leadership positions within many global bodies and now heads
four out of the 15 United Nations specialized agencies, more than France,
Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States (the other permanent members
of the UN Security Council) combined. Beijing uses the leaders of these
agencies to co-opt international institutions, parrot its talking points, and
install Chinese telecommunications equipment in their facilities.
Secretary-General Zhao Houlin of the International Telecommunications Union has
aggressively promoted Huawei sales; International Civil Aviation Organization
Secretary-General Fang Liu blocked Taiwan’s participation in General Assembly
meetings and covered up a Chinese cyber-hack of the organization. China’s
membership on the UN Human Rights Council has enabled the CCP to prevent
criticism of its abuses in Hong Kong, Tibet, and Xinjiang. In many cases, the
CCP’s reach extends to the heads of international organizations who are not
themselves Chinese officials. Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus of
the World Health Organization dutifully repeated false Chinese talking points
on the novel coronavirus outbreak—even opposing international travel
restrictions on China while praising China’s own domestic travel
restrictions.
DECISIVE ACTION
American policymakers, under President Donald Trump’s leadership, are
aware of what the CCP is doing and are taking decisive action to counter it
across the board. The Department of Justice and the FBI are directing resources
to identify foreign agents seeking to influence U.S. policy. The DOJ, for
example, informed Chinese state media company CGTN America of its obligation to
register as a foreign agent as specified under the Foreign Agents Registration
Act, which requires registrants to disclose their activities to federal
authorities and appropriately label information materials they distribute. The
State Department designated the U.S. operations of nine Chinese
state-controlled propaganda outlets as “foreign missions”—which places
personnel and property reporting requirements on them—and implemented a policy
requiring Chinese diplomats to notify and, in some cases, seek permission from
the U.S. government before meeting with state and local government officials
and academic institutions.
The Trump administration is also working to highlight China’s malign
behavior, counter false narratives, and compel transparency. U.S. officials are
leading efforts to educate the American public about the exploitation of the
United States’ free and open society to push a CCP agenda inimical to U.S.
interests and values. That includes combating Beijing’s co-optation and
coercion of its own citizens (and American citizens) in U.S. academic
institutions and working with universities to protect the rights of Chinese
students on American campuses, providing information to counter CCP propaganda
and disinformation, and ensuring an understanding of ethical codes of conduct
in an American academic environment. Chinese military researchers are no longer
allowed to pursue certain advanced technological degrees in the United States.
But real Chinese students, coming here to learn rather than to steal, are
always welcome.
The FBI opens a new case on Chinese economic espionage every ten hours.
The administration has also countered the malign activities of Chinese
companies abetting CCP efforts. It has sanctioned companies such as Huawei that
answer to the CCP’s intelligence and security apparatus, including by imposing
restrictions on Huawei’s access to U.S. semiconductor technology. It is
blocking companies controlled by the Chinese government from purchasing
American businesses with sensitive technologies and private information about
American citizens; the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act signed
into law in 2018 has greatly expanded the United States’ ability to screen
foreign investments that put national security at risk. The Defense Department
recently submitted to Congress a list of companies linked to the People’s
Liberation Army that have operations in the United States so that the American
people are fully informed about the companies they are doing business with.
Washington has also imposed restrictions on dozens of Chinese companies
(as well as Chinese government entities) complicit in China’s campaign of
repression, mass arbitrary detention, forced labor, and surveillance against
Uighurs and other minorities. Officials involved in these abuses can no longer
travel to the United States, and certain goods produced using Uighur forced
labor cannot be imported. Meanwhile, the DOJ has concentrated resources on
prosecuting Chinese technology theft—the FBI opens a new case on Chinese
economic espionage every ten hours. The Securities and Exchange Commission is
working to protect investors by insisting that publicly listed Chinese
companies adhere to the same standard of public oversight and accounting that
firms in the United States and other countries must follow. And the
administration left the UN Human Rights Council in response to the travesty of
its co-optation by China and terminated the United States’ relationship with
the World Health Organization because its response to the pandemic showed that
it, too, is beholden to the CCP.
RECTIFICATION OF NAMES
These steps mark just the beginning of a longer process of correcting 40
years of a one-sided, unfair relationship with China, one that has severely
affected the United States’ economic and, more recently, political well-being.
The Trump administration has spoken with candor and shone the spotlight of
transparency on the CCP’s true character and will continue to so—what Confucius
called a “rectification of names,” making words correspond to reality. The CCP
operates as a global influence and propaganda organization, and the United
States must recognize it as such, neutralizing attempts to dominate global
discourse by recommitting to our own values and reinvigorating the common terminology
that binds us together with our allies and partners. In doing so, we will
improve the resiliency of our institutions, alliances, and partnerships to
prevail against the challenges China presents—ideologically and otherwise.
Washington must also continue to impose costs on Beijing in order to
compel it to cease or reduce actions harmful to the United States’ vital
national interests and those of our allies and partners. The United States can
no longer let the CCP grow stronger at our expense or with our assistance. The
days of American passivity and naivety are over, and we will continue to speak
about and respond to the CCP as it is, not as former U.S. policymakers had
wished it to be. The 2017 National Security Strategy calls this approach “principled
realism.”
Lasting peace comes through strength. The United States is the strongest
country on earth, and it must speak out, fight back, and above all, stay true
to its principles—especially freedom of speech—which stand in stark contrast to
the Marxist-Leninist ideology embraced by the CCP.
来源时间:2020/10/21 发布时间:2020/10/21
旧文章ID:23266